Commit Graph
918 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 c95191736e fix(console): the serial line is found, not assumed -- from the devicetree on a board, COM1 by probe on a PC
Each board has one serial line that is its console, the lowest common
denominator beside the screen and keyboard.  Its address was QEMU's,
fixed: on a Raspberry Pi 5 the aarch64 one is ordinary RAM, written to
with every character printed; on a Milk-V Mars the riscv64 one is the
board's UART with registers four bytes apart, and the UEFI loader would
have waited for ever on its first character; on a PC with no COM1 the
prompt read 0xFF for ever.

console_attach_serial(), called before anything prints: COM1 if a UART
answers there; elsewhere the UART that /chosen/stdout-path names
(fdt_uart.c: alias, path, the address carried up through each bus's
ranges, reg-shift and reg-io-width); with no devicetree, QEMU's.  A
devicetree that names no usable console gives no line, not a guess.  A
line that does not come ready is given up, not waited on.  The riscv64
loader's early serial does the same.

tools/fdt_uart_test.c, run by hand, 19 checks plain and under the
sanitizers: devicetrees shaped like the Mars's, the Pi 5's and QEMU's,
what must find nothing, and a block cut short at every length; and the
Pi 5's real devicetree gives a PL011 at 0x107d001000.

Acceptance, one QEMU at a time: v3 on amd64 (logs/20261013-204436),
aarch64 (-204803) and riscv64 (-205001) to the zuse prompt, no unknown
word, hash 0x08873e0f44b7cb2a on all three as before.  -204600 is an
aarch64 run during which the disk images were restored under it by a
script that had been refused a second QEMU; it passed and is kept, and
was run again.  v4 on the three ISAs (-211149, -211444, -211857): POST
538 of 538, dict_hash 0xe5a57f3eb72ff94a, the typed session unchanged.
The Mars image through OpenSBI and U-Boot in QEMU took its line and its
interrupt controller from the devicetree and passed POST.

Found on the way and not mended (boards/BRINGUP.md 1.6): built with
EMERGENCY_CONSOLE_ENABLED=1 the prompt floods with empty lines.  -210442
shows it; the commit before this does the same.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 21:21:32 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 f4e359859a docs(boards): bring-up checklist for the four boards, and what stands between today and a first boot
What to do on the day a board is on the bench: media, cabling, what to
watch for, what counts as a pass, what to keep.  Written before any board
has been booted.

Section 1 lists what was found in the code while writing it, none of it
fixed: the USB controller driver matches QEMU's controller only; the
production build shows no prompt without a thumbdrive login; there is no
USB keyboard driver and no disk driver but virtio; on the Pi 5 the console
writes every character to QEMU's UART address, which is RAM there; on the
Mars the console's UART register layout is probably not the board's; the
board images cannot build the v4 node.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 20:22:30 -04:00
rajames 010cfc54e6 my shit 2026-10-13 20:20:49 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 66b26f823c fix(v4.0.0): step 6e final review -- texts begun in order; a word no one will read lets its writer go; a cut wire wakes a wait for room; a full console wire is a refusal, not a fault
The final review of step 6e, by a fresh reviewer told to break it, and
what was ruled: fix them all, test first.  Each has a test that failed
before the mend.

- Two texts from one node could be begun in the wrong order when room
  for their answers came between the node's look at the first and at the
  second.  Texts whose answers go by the same port are begun in the order
  they came: (D-MASK), quit.v4.  102 of 700 timings were wrong before.
- A word written with PORT! to a node that speaks whole messages, or to
  a console's port, blocked its writer for ever and cut off every node
  beyond it.  It is error 18 now, whether that node is asleep, running
  or stuck: fabric.c, node.c.
- A node asleep for room on one wire is woken when another of its wires
  is cut.
- A line there was no room for on the lone node's wire was reported as a
  fault and ended the hosted program.  It is Message refused, and the
  prompt comes back: V4_BOOT_LINE_REFUSED.  hosted-check has the case;
  no bare-metal boot has typed it.
- Ruled: text behind held output for the same port is refused though it
  would fit.  MESH.md 7d.4 said otherwise and is corrected.
- The removal test also cuts and re-makes a wire, and has an exchange in
  which output is held at a full wire: 26,814 disturbances in all.
- MESH.md and v4/README.md no longer say that a stuck node holds up no
  other node, that only printing waits, or that no node is left waiting
  on one that is gone; 7d.6 lists the limits and what the products do
  that they did not before.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check, lint.  Three
bare-metal boots: logs/20261013-194827 (amd64), -195131 (aarch64),
-195518 (riscv64).  POST 538 of 538, word_count=317,
dict_hash=0xe5a57f3eb72ff94a on all six; the three sessions are the same
character for character.  The boots were built with the working tree's
uncommitted change to kernel/Makefile that adds the ISA to the kernel's
version line.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 20:02:33 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 06da5700bc feat(v4.0.0): step 6e -- a node removed at any step leaves the rest at rest; written up
test_host_mesh.c, 220 checks: three exchanges on the row of three -- text
from the console for node 12 with what it prints and how it ended; node 11
SENDing node 12 text and waiting for its answer; a message node 12 has no
way for and its NACK to node 10 -- are each played once for every engine
step they take with node 11 removed at that step, and again with node 12:
17,642 removals at 64 bits.  Every node left comes to rest asleep, blocked
at no port and in no operation, and answers.  What is typed is a word
defined beforehand, so that the steps are the exchange's and not the
dictionary being searched.

Removed from the engine, nothing using them: v4_fabric_interrupt_error, a
device's pending hook, v4_node_words_since_look, V4_ERROR_INTERRUPTED.

MESH.md: 4.1's table has the addresses after the ports; 7a and 7b say what
of them still holds; 7b.7's limit is closed; step 6e is written up.
v4/README.md likewise.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check, lint.  Three
bare-metal boots with the typed session and a loop printing 400 numbers:
logs/20261013-165124 (amd64), -165428 (aarch64), -165818 (riscv64).  POST
538 of 538, word_count=317, dict_hash=0x0951d7e02e251554 on all six, and
the three sessions are the same character for character.  The boots were
built with the working tree's uncommitted change to kernel/Makefile that
adds the ISA to the kernel's version line; nothing else differs from this
commit.

The plan's final review is not done yet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 17:47:05 -04:00
rajames ab96a9f2be docs: fix stale path references in .claude/CLAUDE.md
Re-root stale  references to actual locations:  (shared engine/hosted) and  (LithosAnanke). Update source tree diagram accordingly, correct / counts, and remove the obsolete  bullet. Also fix include paths (, ).

Surgical correction only; no behavioral changes.
2026-10-09 19:34:30 -04:00
rajames 2e6262c91f docs: update stale entry docs and deprecate superseded docs with annotations
- docs/lithosananke/README.md + ROADMAP.md: correct branch topology (no
  lithosananke branch post-split; master is the sole line), mark M7.1 as
  live, and fix build commands (kernel/Makefile, not Makefile.starkernel)
- docs/README.md: refresh current active work (Tripod = Hera/Artemis/Hestia,
  M7.1 live, StarForth v4) and flag INDEX.md as stale
- docs/INDEX.md: add dated-snapshot staleness banner
- Add TARGET-HAL / OBSOLETE / SUPERSEDED banners to stale HAL, physics,
  heartbeat, and DoE docs under docs/working/ (annotation only, no deletions)
2026-10-09 18:21:10 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 f1419e739c fix(v4.0.0): step 6e review round 2 -- only the message looked at is taken, moved or dropped; the kernel's port has no queue in a fabric; an answer nobody awaits is not a loss
- Engine: a wire keeps whether the message at its mark is the one last
  looked at; a node's take, move and drop of any other answer 3 and write
  nothing (MESH.md 7d.3).  A wire cut and made again between a look and a
  take no longer has a NACK done as text, or 256 cells written where one
  was looked for.
- Engine: v4_fabric_wire_kernel wires a kernel to a port with no queues;
  a message for it is refused at once, error 18, on a mesh as on the
  products.
- The result of a drop is looked at; a take that does not take has the
  message dropped, or gone past: nothing goes round.
- An answer nobody waits for is let go uncounted; (LOST) counts what should
  have been delivered or acted on and was not.  The flood's account is
  exact.
- Error 18 from under a word that was printing empties the data stack, as
  a fault does: that word's own values are not left there.
- Tests: the take and drop windows cut at every step, with and without
  another message put; a refusal owed to a stuck node whose wire is full.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 22:36:59 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 6a7d0aa27f fix(v4.0.0): step 6e review round 1 -- a take that does not take does nothing; output and answers wait at a middle node; no queue on the kernel's port; a printing wait is not interrupted
- The result of every take is looked at: a wire cut between the look and
  the take leaves nothing acted on (the text before run again, a refusal
  counted, a wait ended by an old answer, a way forgotten).
- A node with no room to pass on what another printed, or its word of how
  text ended, leaves it on the wire it came by and moves it when there is
  room; what is behind it for the same port waits too.  Sleep for room (9)
  is woken by room on any of the node's wires (engine; MESH.md 7d.3).
- The lone node's host keeps no queue for the kernel's port: a message to
  it is error 18.  The step limit is counted while the node waits for room.
- A text waiting for room to print is not interrupted by console text;
  AWAIT is, as before.  (BREAK?) is gone.
- A GONE is believed only by the centre's port; unawaited answers let go
  are counted; nothing past a message's last character goes on a wire;
  AWAIT sets (AWAIT-FROM) only once the stack has been tried.
- test_host_depth.c: ten paths, each run works or ends in one named stack
  error; it fails with (ROOM) or (ROOM-SERVE) taken out.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 20:01:11 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 b1d09af043 feat(v4.0.0): messages are whole and wait on the wire -- a node keeps none but the one it is doing
Step 6e, tasks 2 and 3 (docs/v4.0.0/MESH.md 7d).  The nucleus puts, looks
at, takes, moves and drops whole messages through the six addresses after
its ports; its own ring of messages waiting, the refusals owed, (GATE) and
the looking words' use are gone.  SEND, an answer, a NACK and a GONE go or
are refused at once; what a text prints waits for room; a text is not
begun until the wire its answer goes by has room for it, and that room is
kept.  The lone node's host (v4/system/boot.c) keeps its two wires and
does its operations; the test hosts' consoles put and take whole messages
through the fabric.  New: tests/test_host_depth.c, every message path of
a mesh node at every depth of both stacks.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 15:59:37 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 83694b18be fix(v4.0.0): wire review round 1 -- tests for the wake-up order and for waking only on enough room; no overflow moving a message; sleep for impossible room answers at once
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 14:12:33 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 d5cd64605d feat(v4.0.0): the wire in the engine -- whole messages, put and taken in one step
Queues of whole messages on the wires between nodes (v4/wire.h), the six
addresses and ten operations a node asks of the fabric (MESH.md 7d.3), and the
fabric's pool of queues. Engine only: the nucleus does not use any of it yet.
The ports in the host map move to BUF0_W - 140 so that the new addresses are
not among the nucleus variables, with a compile-time check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 13:50:15 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 50be766e7b chore: ignore .directory; track the bare-metal run files of 3 to 8 October
One doe-<arch>-<time>.csv is written by each QEMU boot; the 96 from the
boots of steps 6 to 6d were untracked.  Committed so that the tree is
clean before step 6e begins: this commit is its rollback point.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 13:13:48 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 88554666d4 docs(v4.0.0): step 6e -- the plan; a mark on each wire, a sleep woken by a message coming, and the room probe
MESH.md 7d.3 amended while the plan was written: first and next in place
of find by type; sleep is woken by a message coming, not by one being
there; operation 10, room.  7d.4: room for a text's answer is kept on
the wire back.  7d.9: a ping across hops, thought about and not ruled.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 12:58:13 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 7eb545f387 docs(v4.0.0): step 6e -- messages on the wire: the second attempt at the wait
MESH.md 7d: the rulings, the wire, what a node asks of the fabric, the
nucleus, the products, the limits, the acceptance, and the later step of
keeping the wires in the system's blocks.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 12:47:55 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 8967c93241 docs(v4.0.0): the root causes behind the wait's faults, and the boots of the code that mends them
MESH.md 7c.7: the stacks doubled in scratch and each path measured -- the
size was never the cause; EMIT's overrun of the output buffer, and a
message's first word moving before there was room for the rest; what is
left for a second design; the depth sweep.

Three bare-metal boots of 0d91608f typing the deep-stack lines: POST 538
of 538, word_count=317, dict_hash=0x3629660aa2dc6823 on all six.  Three
earlier amd64 boots of the same code, whose typed session was wrong, are
kept.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 12:25:19 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 0d91608f39 fix(v4.0.0): EMIT ran past the output buffer; a message's first word was read before there was room for the rest
The two root causes behind what the reviews of the wait found, both in
the code as it stands.  Each with a check that failed first.

EMIT stored its character and only then looked whether the buffer was
exactly full.  A flush that ended in a fault -- the stack too deep to
begin a message -- left the buffer full, and the fault's own message was
then put past its end, with (OUT^) never again at the end to be flushed.
The 28 cells after the buffer happen to be unused, so nothing showed;
the wait had put the ports there, and the node blocked writing to one.
EMIT now sends a buffer it finds full before it stores.

AWAIT, and (GATE) when a neighbour is writing, read a message's first
word and then used stack that was not known to be there.  With 27 or 28
values on the stack, or 28 or 29 calls deep, a line typed during AWAIT
was taken and never answered.  (ROOM) tries six cells and four return
entries first: if they are not there the text ends 'Stack overflow' with
nothing read.  (GATE) tries the three cells its writing needs before a
first word goes; it was safe before only by the order things were done.

v4/tools/depthsweep.py runs every message path of the hosted product at
every depth of both stacks: each line typed must be answered and the
node must come back.  hosted-check runs it.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 11:46:05 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 6015c87157 revert(v4.0.0): step 6d, the wait, is backed out -- two reviews found it unsound
Ruled 2026-10-08.  The engine, the nucleus and their tests are as they
were at dfabfa46, before step 6d; the code of the wait and its tests are
in history at 075385ab..2cf37aab.  The limit of MESH.md 7b.7 stands: a
node that is stuck can hold up its neighbours until Hera kills it.

MESH.md 7c is kept as the record of the design as approved, and 7c.6 says
what was built, what the two reviews found, the cause the findings share
-- a node's message machinery runs on the stacks its text is using, and a
fault abandons whatever was in progress -- and what a second attempt
must settle before anything is built.

Kept from it, in hosted-check: a line that leaves 29 values on the stack,
and WORDS with 26 values on it.  Both hung the products at some commit of
the wait.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check, lint; three
bare-metal boots typing both.  POST 538 of 538, word_count=317,
dict_hash=0xc0769523a47b7dc3 on all six: the hash of step 6c's code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 07:31:40 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 10f5ffd00b docs(v4.0.0): step 6d as mended after its review; the boots on that code
MESH.md 4.1, 7a, 7c.2, 7c.3, 7c.4 and step 6d say what the code now does,
what the review found and how each was mended, and what is small and not
mended.  The README no longer says the aim is unmet; it says the mended
code has not been reviewed again.

Three bare-metal boots on 2cf37aab, typing 29 values on a line: POST 538
of 538, word_count=317, dict_hash=0xd41a6ac9448fff60 on all six.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 06:44:12 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 2cf37aab4f fix(v4.0.0): step 6d after its review -- no error in the middle of the messages waiting, no offer left standing
Ruled 2026-10-08: A, B, C, D and the guard for a half message.  Each with
a scene in test_host_mesh.c that failed first.

A. The words of a message after its first are written from the passes
   over the messages waiting by (!W): an offer and a wait for that offer
   only (a new engine address).  A reader removed in mid-message makes no
   error; the rest is let go and counted.  Before, the error left the
   messages waiting in pieces and the node going round for ever.
B. A store to the wait withdraws every offer; (GATE1) and (PAY-SET) do it
   first.  Before, text begun after a node went round without sleeping
   could go to the port of an older offer: text for one node was done by
   another.
C. What a finished text printed is put with the messages waiting, as how
   it ended is.  With no room either is let go and counted; neither is
   begun as a message from (FINISH) any more, where a stuck node on the
   way held the whole node.
D. Only what a sender is owed from an earlier text -- its output, how it
   ended -- holds that sender's next text back; a GONE does not; and what
   cannot be noted holds nothing.  A node's own messages keep the order
   they were made in.
-  A message half taken in when its writer is removed is let go
   ((MQ-MEND)), not kept as if whole.
-  Smaller: a refused line no longer ends a waiting text 'Interrupted';
   a node's own queued messages may be passed on by 16 nodes, not 15; no
   value is left on the stack when a port goes in mid-refusal.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 06:34:15 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 380f1cc6ec fix(v4.0.0): 29 values left on the stack hung the node; and what the review of step 6d found
The review of step 6d found it not sound.  Mended here, with a check
that failed first: a text that left 29 values on the stack hung the
node for ever, on the products too -- the passes over the messages
waiting that follow every text need four cells, and a stack fault in the
middle of one left the messages in pieces.  Such a text ends 'Stack
overflow', as before step 6d.  hosted-check types it.

The other findings are open and are written under step 6d in MESH.md
section 10; the README no longer says the aim is met.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check.  The bare
metal boots have not been made again.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 01:59:28 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 2b587206ee feat(v4.0.0): the wait replaces looking and the console release; step 6d written up
The engine's console release (v4_fabric_interrupt_error), a device's
pending, and the count of words since a look are removed: nothing uses
them.  MESH.md 4.1, 7b and 7c say what was built, where it differs from
what was approved and why, and what is still a limit; step 6d is marked
built, with the defects found on the way.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check, lint; three
bare-metal boots.  POST 538 of 538, word_count=317,
dict_hash=0x6a39c0bb9d183418 on all six.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 01:24:09 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 ec817a8264 fix(v4.0.0): a waiting node goes on passing on and paying; KILL is not held by a stuck node
Found in the five-node test, each with a check that failed first:
- A node with answers it could not give to two stuck senders began no
  text at all.  It now holds back only text from a sender whose own
  answer is still with it.
- KILL waited to tell a stuck node, and a typed line that broke it left
  the nodes after it untold.  GONE is put with the messages waiting, as
  how text ended is, and goes when it can.
- So that 'tell, then wait' still works, AWAIT does what (IDLE) does but
  for beginning text: it looks through the messages waiting, offers what
  is to be passed on and what is owed, and sleeps in the wait.  A waiting
  node no longer keeps back what passes through it.
- A node in the wait with an offer on a port that turns out to have
  nothing on it is woken and told so (which port: 2 * V4_PORTS + k); no
  error is raised on it.  (GATE) makes it error 18; (IDLE) and AWAIT let
  the message go.  Before, removing a node raised 'No one on that port'
  on the unrelated text of a neighbour that had something queued for it.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 01:00:33 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 353783726d fix(v4.0.0): a node's answer goes before its sender's next text -- the last commit failed hosted-check
1c720ab2 was committed with hosted-check failing: with how text ended
queued, a line typed while the node waited was done before the earlier
line's answer had gone, and the pass that offers what is to be passed on
let go text that was for the node itself.

How text ended is put before the other messages waiting; a node does not
begin another text from a sender while its answer to that sender is
still with it; and what is for the node itself is not offered.

make -C v4 test and sanitize at both widths, hosted-check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 00:07:41 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 1c720ab2c7 fix(v4.0.0): what a node passes on waits with it, offered -- a relay is not held by a stuck node
Found after the last commit: a message being passed on toward a node that
was stuck held the node passing it on in the wait, taking in what came
but serving none of it; text typed for a stuck node left Hera deaf.  And
a node that had done text for a sender that then stuck waited on it to
give its answer.

A node with nothing to do now deals first with what is for itself; then
offers at once the first message for each port and each refusal owed,
and sleeps in the wait.  What is taken is written and done with; the
rest stays with the messages waiting, in order.  How text ended is put
with the messages waiting, not written from (FINISH).  The stack is kept
as shallow between lines as it was.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 23:51:30 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 482cc75faf feat(v4.0.0): every message begins through the wait -- a stuck node holds up no one
(GATE) offers a message's first word and sleeps until it is taken, taking
in whatever is written to the node meanwhile; (PAY) offers every refusal
owed at once, one to a port; a node that owes one sleeps in the wait.
Writing without looking, looking again and again, and the lower-number
rule are gone.  Text from the console for a node whose own text waits to
begin a message ends that text Interrupted.  The lone node's hosts serve
an offer as a write.  MESH.md 7c; plan step 6d task 2.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 23:38:07 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 075385ab63 feat(v4.0.0): the wait in the engine -- a node offers a word and sleeps
A node stores a word to offer on any of its ports and fetches the wait: it
is blocked until a word comes for it or one of its offers is taken, and
the fabric does the handing over in one step.  The port block moves in
the nucleus's map to make room for the new addresses.  Nothing uses it
yet.  MESH.md 7c; plan step 6d task 1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 23:15:11 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 dfabfa46f6 docs(v4.0.0): step 6d -- the plan; and the wait offers on each port, not one
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 22:27:21 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 5150155281 docs(v4.0.0): step 6d -- the wait: rulings, engine, nucleus, limits and acceptance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 22:24:12 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 59727f762a fix(v4.0.0): step 6c mended after its review -- what a stuck or gone node can and cannot hold up
The review of step 6c found it did not keep its rule.  Ruled: fix them
all; 16 hops.

- Paying a NACK no longer waits on a lower-numbered neighbour; a node
  that owes one does not sleep, and goes on taking in what it is sent.
- AWAIT looks first through the messages already waiting.
- A node waiting to write to a removed neighbour gets error 18: the
  word that says who is reading also says which ports have anything on
  them.
- A console line lets Hera go when she is blocked on the first word of
  a message (v4_fabric_interrupt_error, a device's `pending`).
- A refused answer is told to the node that waits, not the one that
  answered; one owed to the node itself goes to its own queue.
- A message is passed on by at most 16 nodes, then refused.
- A GONE is believed only when it says it is from the node's centre.
- Tests: the check that tested nothing is replaced; no room for a
  waiting sender; the limit that remains is tested as a limit.
- MESH.md 7b's rule reworded to what holds, 7b.7 says where it falls
  short; README likewise.

make -C v4 test, sanitize, hosted-check; three bare-metal boots.  POST
538 of 538, word_count=317, dict_hash=0xc0769523a47b7dc3 on all six.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 22:18:06 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 d343001dea feat(v4.0.0): refusals and waits on bare metal, and step 6c written up
The bare-metal host hands a waiting node the next line typed, as the
hosted one does: 5 AWAIT, then 7 8 * . -- Interrupted, then 56.

amd64, aarch64 and riscv64 boot, POST 538 of 538, word_count=317,
dict_hash 0x54520ade672566ad, the same as the three hosted programs:
logs/20261007-202737, -203230, -203616.

MESH.md step 6c: what was built, how it was verified, and two things
found on the way that are not mended and are for ruling: Hera blocked
writing to a stuck node, and a message that can go round for ever between
two nodes whose ways disagree.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 20:38:20 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 ee2bbf4ecf feat(v4.0.0): Hera kills a node by number and tells the others it is gone
Hera keeps a table of the nodes she has had born, number and place.
KILL ( n -- ): she asks the kernel to remove node n, forgets her own way
to it, and sends GONE about it to every other node in the table.  A node
she never had born, herself, or one she has killed already is an error
that says so, and nothing is removed.  v3's word and meaning; v3's takes
a name, and a mesh node has a number.

test_host_unit.c, 74 checks: Hera kills node 14 while node 12 is blocked
writing to it, and what 12 then sends there is refused; node 12 waits on
node 13, stuck in a loop and not its neighbour, and the wait ends Node
gone when Hera kills 13; Hera waits on node 12, stuck, and a line typed at
the console ends her wait Interrupted and then kills 12.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 20:27:06 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 cbe1cd5e44 feat(v4.0.0): a line from the console breaks a wait
Text for a node from its console, arriving while the node waits for an
answer (AWAIT), is kept as any message is; the wait ends in error 21,
Interrupted; and the text is then done as usual.  Console text for
another node, passing through a node that is waiting, does not end its
wait.

On the hosted program 5 AWAIT ended the program with "the node stopped".
The boot now reports that the line is waiting, the host reads the next
line and hands it over, which breaks the wait, and then has the kept line
done.  The bare-metal host does the same; it is booted in the commit that
follows.

test_host_mesh.c: 76 checks, both widths and the sanitizers.  hosted-check
types 5 AWAIT and two more lines: Interrupted, then 3 and 56.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 20:16:58 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 9efe8aad3a feat(v4.0.0): a refused message is told to its sender -- NACK and GONE
A node that has no room for a message, or no way to pass it on, lets it
go and counts it as before, and now notes that it owes its sender a NACK
(type 4: the node the message was for).  It sends what it owes when it
next has nothing else to do.  36 cells of the messages waiting are kept
for NACK and GONE, and nothing is owed for either.

A node sent a NACK counts it in (REFUSED); one waiting for an answer from
that node (AWAIT) stops, with error 19, Message refused.  A GONE (type 5)
from a node's centre makes it forget the way to the node named (NO-ROUTE,
new), and ends a wait on it with error 20, Node gone.  From anyone else
it is ignored.  GONE ( n node -- ) sends one.

test_host_mesh.c, three nodes: text for a node nobody has a way to comes
back to the console, and to a node two away, as a NACK; a waiting sender's
line ends Message refused; a node that is waiting keeps what it has room
for, owes eight refusals, counts the rest, and sends them when its wait is
ended by a GONE from its centre.  70 checks, both widths, sanitizers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 19:58:27 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 6e1ac157c6 docs(v4.0.0): step 6c -- refusals and waits: rulings, design, acceptance and plan
MESH.md 7b: no message is lost without its sender being told, and no
node waits for ever.  What v3 does, from the code, and what could not be
established.  A refusal travels back as a NACK; Hera ends a wait on a
stuck node by killing it and tells the others it is gone; a line from the
console breaks a wait.  Step 6c has the acceptance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 19:43:43 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 a425f738a4 fix(kernel): the block chain's fast RAM is cleared on the v3 path
It came from kmalloc, which does not clear what it hands out; only the
ramdrive beside it was cleared.  A VM's BLOCK on blocks 0 to 2047 read
whatever had been in the kernel's heap.  The v4 path already cleared its
own.

Accepted on the v3 configuration: amd64, aarch64 and riscv64 reach the
zuse prompt, no UNKNOWN WORD, PARITY:M7.1a hash 0x08873e0f44b7cb2a on all
three, as before.  logs/20261007-140609, -140735, -140946.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 14:10:49 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 193523d873 fix(v4.0.0): three defects -- a refused device write, a failed starting state, a case that QUITs
A block write the device refuses after the kernel has taken the node's
copy: the node was told "Storage refused" while the kernel's cache kept
the new data, to be read back and perhaps written later.  The kernel now
puts its own copy back as it was.  Tested with a device whose writes can
be made to fail; it failed first.

POST's runner: a case whose starting state could not be set says so, with
what the node said, where it showed nothing; and a case that ends with
QUIT fails, as it did when the cases were a capsule, where the runner had
taken it for a completed line.  Both tests failed first.

The v4 boot says "Artemis: virtio-blk attached" only when the attach
worked.

make -C v4 test, sanitize and hosted-check pass; amd64, aarch64 and
riscv64 boot, POST 538 of 538, dict_hash 0x5f0a949a6fc8ef2b on all six:
logs/20261007-135741, -140004, -140329.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 14:05:14 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 bc6deab3f5 fix(v4.0.0): a node blocked at a port with no one on it is given an error, not left there
A node writing to a node that was stuck, and was then killed, stayed
blocked for ever: killing a stuck node could cost its neighbours.  And on
the hosted and bare-metal products a write to an empty port, 5 7 PORT!,
ended the program with "the node stopped".

Now a node that can take an error, blocked writing to or reading from one
port that nothing is wired to -- nothing ever was, or what was there has
been killed or the wire cut -- has error 18, No one on that port, raised
on it and goes on.  A bare node waits as on the fabric; so does a node
whose neighbour is asleep, and one reading "any port".

test_host_unit.c: Hera kills node 14 while node 12 is blocked writing to
it.  It failed first: 12 stayed blocked.  test_fabric.c: a bare node still
waits.  hosted-check types 5 7 PORT! and goes on; it failed first too.

make -C v4 test, sanitize and hosted-check pass; amd64, aarch64 and
riscv64 boot, POST 538 of 538, dict_hash 0x5f0a949a6fc8ef2b on all six:
logs/20261007-121743, -122008, -122337.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 12:25:35 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 18adf59091 fix(v4.0.0): POST leaves nothing, as v3 really does; and what the review of step 6b found
Captain Bob was told that v3 leaves the words POST's cases define in the
dictionary, and ruled that v4 should.  That was false: v3's run_test_suite
puts the dictionary back after each word's cases (test_common.c:333,
:365).  Shown that, he ruled that POST leaves nothing.  The boot now
seals the system, runs POST, and has the node do COLD, whose printing is
not shown; PARITY:V4_SYSTEM is the system as sealed.

A case the node does not come back from ends POST there, named, with how
many were not run: it would have stalled the boot for hours, where the
capsule had ended it.  The runner's test of it now uses a word that
really never ends.

hosted-check also requires that RS1 and T{ are unknown after boot, and
boots a program whose POST has failing cases (tests/post_cases_fail.c):
PARITY:FAIL, POST: FAILED, no prompt, none of a case's printing shown.

Comments and documents that still named the POST capsule or its two
hooks are brought up to date; NUCLEUS.md 6.3 says what v3 does, with the
lines, and how the wrong ruling came about.

make -C v4 test, sanitize and hosted-check pass; amd64, aarch64 and
riscv64 boot, POST 538 of 538, word_count=314, dict_hash
0x220ab283a504a3b3 on all six: logs/20261007-112638, -112901, -113220.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 11:40:20 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 eda6577a53 docs(v4.0.0): step 6a withdrawn -- drives that come and go are built as v3 has them
Captain Bob, 2026-10-07.  Rulings 6 and 8 of MESH.md 8.1 (a device
identity in the block header, a returning device's old numbers, release
by moving its blocks off, holes) were given without v3's design having
been shown.  MESH.md 8.7 sets v3's design beside them: a removable drive
is a person's, known by its signature; WIREBIND; it joins at the tail and
only the tail leaves; EJECT flushes to the drive and kills the user's VM.

ENGINE.md steps 7 and 8 now say that is where it is built.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 11:06:33 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 4bdb210a99 feat(v4.0.0): POST is the kernel's -- the boot feeds the cases, and nothing of the harness is on the node
The boot runs POST with the runner (v4/system/post.c) after the capsules:
it feeds the 538 cases to the node and judges them from outside.  A
case's printing no longer reaches the console.  What the cases define
stays in the dictionary, as in v3; the system is sealed after POST and
the boot prints PARITY:V4_SYSTEM word_count=N dict_hash=..., as v3 prints
its parity after POST.

Gone: capsules/v4/post79.4th and its blocks 7000 up; the harness words;
(CATCH) and (EMIT-HOOK), with what EMIT and the prompt loop did for them.

The generator runs v3 on the lines as the kernel sends them, without the
capsule's "T| ".  One expected result follows from that: >IN.initial
prints 6, not 9.

make -C v4 test, sanitize and hosted-check pass; amd64, aarch64 and
riscv64 boot, POST 538 of 538, word_count=411, dict_hash
0x6fb1d09418b189ee on all six: logs/20261007-105118, -105335, -105651.
T{ is unknown at the prompt; RS1 prints 42 42 before and after COLD.  A
scratch build with one expectation changed names the case and ends
PARITY:FAIL, POST: FAILED.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 10:59:02 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 2bf958ce3a feat(v4.0.0): the POST runner -- the kernel feeds a case and judges it from outside
v4/system/post.c: for each case it empties the node's data stack, sends
DECIMAL FORTH DEFINITIONS, sends the case's lines keeping what the node
prints, reads the stack, and judges: an error exactly if one is expected,
and otherwise the stack and every character printed.  A failing case is
named with what it printed and left.  Nothing of it is on the node.

Its tests are in test_host_quit.c, on that test's node: 29 checks of cases
that must pass and cases that must fail -- a wrong value, depth, order or
output, an error wanted or unwanted, a case of two lines, depth-only
cases, the starting state, more printing than is kept, and a line that
never comes back.  Both widths and the sanitizers.

The boot still runs the capsule; that is the next commit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 10:36:36 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 c2f4b9808a feat(v4.0.0): POST's cases as a table the kernel holds
mkpost.py writes v4/system/post_cases.c where it wrote the capsule: for
each case its name, its lines, and what it must do -- end in an error, or
leave v3's stack and print v3's output, which is now held in full where
the capsule held its length and a checksum.

The same 538 cases: checked against capsules/v4/post79.4th case by case --
names, lines, stacks, and the length and checksum of each output -- with
no difference.  The capsule is still what the boot runs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 10:34:03 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 b04ae55ec5 docs(v4.0.0): step 6b -- POST is the kernel's: design, acceptance and plan
NUCLEUS.md 6.3 and section 7 as approved 2026-10-07: the kernel holds the
cases as a table and feeds them to the node; a runner judges from outside;
what the cases define stays, as in v3; a PARITY:V4_SYSTEM line after POST.
The capsule harness and its two nucleus variables are withdrawn (6.3a
keeps what they were).  MESH.md step 6b has the acceptance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 10:27:47 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 9bfd5071d2 feat(v4.0.0): the block words are the kernel's -- v3's way in full
Ruled 2026-10-07.  BLOCK, BUFFER, UPDATE, SAVE-BUFFERS and EMPTY-BUFFERS
are each one kernel request on port 0, by block number only.  The node
has a window of four slots in its memory, as a v3 VM has; the kernel
copies blocks into it, keeps the record of which block is in which slot,
and decides when a block is written (v4/system/blocks.c).  The node keeps
no record and gives the kernel no address, so a request cannot overwrite
the node's code.  When a block is written stays FORTH-79's: UPDATE marks
it.  When the chain of devices changes the slots are let go, as in v3.

The window is 512 cells more than the two buffers were; the dictionary
space ends that much lower, at 13824.

MESH.md 8.5 had said, from the review, that a v3 VM's BLOCK is the
kernel's buffer.  It is not, and the section now says what was reported,
what v3 does, and what was ruled.

make -C v4 test, sanitize and hosted-check pass; amd64, aarch64 and
riscv64 boot, POST 538 of 538, the same hashes on all six:
logs/20261007-092835, -093112, -093456.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 09:37:30 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 7f4d946d2e docs(v4.0.0): storage -- correct what MESH.md 8.5 said of v3's BLOCK
It said a v3 VM's BLOCK gives the kernel's buffer.  It does not: each v3
VM has a window of four slots in its own memory, and BLOCK copies the
kernel's block into one.  The entry now says what v3 does and where v4
differs from it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 09:09:20 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 bcfd6556a8 fix(v4.0.0): storage -- what the review of step 6 found
A block request with fewer than two values on the stack is refused; it
had acted on whatever the stack ring held and stopped the node.

Bare metal: when the kernel's chain takes the place of POST's block RAM
the node's two buffers are emptied, so it no longer holds POST's copy of
a block; and the chain's fast RAM is cleared, so a node cannot read what
was in the kernel's heap.

blocks.c is built with each test under that test's own warnings and
sanitizers; it had been left out of both.  The hosted link cleans its
object directory first: it had linked the withdrawn store_v3.o left there
from the day before.

node.h and DECOMPOSITION.md D-19 no longer describe the message device or
the four registers as current.  MESH.md 8.5 records two findings for
ruling: a node's own copy of a block, and a block read over a node's code.

From a clean build: make -C v4 test, sanitize and hosted-check pass;
amd64, aarch64 and riscv64 boot, POST 538 of 538, same hashes, blocks 1
and 2047 clean at the prompt: logs/20261007-085017, -085254, -085636.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 08:58:52 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 6d90375da7 docs(v4.0.0): storage -- step 6 done
MESH.md step 6 as built, what is not as intended yet, and step 6b for
POST becoming the kernel's.  README and V3-PARITY.md brought up to date.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 08:31:23 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 7c06bdfdb6 refactor(v3): the block subsystem is one chain again
blk_chain_default, blk_chain_new and blk_chain_select (0e761cb1) were for
a node's own drive, which was withdrawn on 2026-10-07 (docs/v4.0.0/MESH.md
8.5).  They are taken out.  What remains of that change is that
blk_subsys_init takes no VM.

Accepted on the v3 configuration: amd64, aarch64 and riscv64 reach the
zuse prompt, no UNKNOWN WORD, PARITY:M7.1a hash 0x08873e0f44b7cb2a on all
three, as before.  logs/20261007-082647, -082752, -082938.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 08:30:38 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 d5b7235464 feat(v4.0.0): every node asks the kernel for its blocks; a born node is not POSTed
A block is a kernel request, as ENGINE.md 3.3 has it: the node puts the
block's number and the address of 256 cells on its stack and writes the
request to port 0, and the kernel leaves the status there.  The requests
are -1, read, and -2, write, the same for every node.  v4/system/blocks.c
serves them from the kernel's block subsystem, which is v3's.  The four
storage registers are gone from the engine.

The device that spoke block messages (4a505a15) is withdrawn with its
test and its message types: Captain Bob ruled on 2026-10-07 that it, a
node's own drive, and nodes with no storage had left the OS as designed
(docs/v4.0.0/MESH.md 8.5).

Hera no longer sends POST to the nodes she births: POST is the kernel's,
once.  Every node has its kernel on port 0; it serves a node's blocks and,
for Hera alone, her requests for nodes and capsules.

Bare metal: the node boots and is POSTed against POST's own block RAM,
and the kernel's chain -- fast RAM, the ramdrive, the virtio disk -- is
set up after POST and before the prompt, as on the v3 path.  The disk is
read and not written: nothing in v4 yet gives the owner's word that it
may be formatted.  A hosted program has the chain's fast RAM, as hosted
v3 has with no disk.  Error 17 is Storage refused.

make -C v4 test and sanitize pass at both widths; hosted-check passes on
three ISAs; amd64, aarch64 and riscv64 boot, POST 538 of 538, with the
typed session: logs/20261007-081603, -081839, -082226.  The hashes are
the same on all six.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 08:24:47 -04:00