Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 080b7012ba fix(usb): the xHCI controller is found by class on any bus, sized, taken from the firmware, and 64-byte contexts laid out
boards/BRINGUP.md A1, FABRIC-3 SXL.  It was matched by QEMU's own IDs on
bus 0 alone, so no real board's was found.  Now pci_find_class() reads
every bus/slot/function; pci_bar_size() sizes BAR0; the USB Legacy Support
capability hands the controller over from the BIOS, SMIs off; CSZ=1
contexts are placed 64 bytes apart instead of refused.  XHCI_QEMU_ARGS
lets QEMU place the controller as real hardware does.

Test first: an NEC controller behind a PCIe root port -- no attach before,
Zuse minted after, on all three ISAs.  Standard acceptance unchanged; five
hot-plugged identities attach.  Not rehearsable: firmware handoff, CSZ=1.
Still open: only the first controller found is used.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 13:30:50 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 0e2c60dac3 fix(raspi): the Pi 5's native path turns the MMU and caches on before any C; bounded mailbox; framebuffer address from dma-ranges
boards/BRINGUP.md R2/R3, FABRIC-3 SXXXIX.  The entry stub cleans the cache
over the image, builds an identity map (the image's GiB Normal, the rest
Device) and enables MMU and caches at EL2 (or EL1); rpi5_mmu.c makes the
devicetree's RAM Normal and the framebuffer uncached.  Mailbox waits give
up after one second; the buffer is cleaned around the exchange; the
framebuffer address goes through dma-ranges, not a Pi 4 mask.

New rpi5-rehearsal target runs the native image on QEMU virt at EL2.  It
found three more that would each have stopped the board: the PL011 shift
(mine, c9519173; the host test asserted it), the GIC address not carried
through /soc's ranges (new fdt_reg_address(), checked against the real
Pi 5 DTB), and no timer IRQ at EL2 (HCR_EL2.IMO/FMO/AMO).

Rehearsal: POST 1052 passed, same parity hash as UEFI.  Standard acceptance
on three ISAs: POST 1052, hash 0x82f4ae7cb2e2d424.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 12:58:35 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 9772ee8b68 fix(repl): the bring-up build's prompt waits for a line instead of answering itself without end
Built with EMERGENCY_CONSOLE_ENABLED=1 and booted with no identity logged
in, the prompt printed "ok>  ok" without end, 1.4 million times in 200
seconds (logs/20261013-210442).  sk_console_readline() gave up at once
whenever no identity was present.  The production build answers that by
going silent until a login; the bring-up build, which needs no login,
took it as an empty line and asked again.  The give-up is now the
production build's only.

Found rehearsing boards/BRINGUP.md; it predates the console change of
c9519173 (the image built from the commit before that did the same).

The riscv64 bring-up build, no thumbdrive, three lines typed
(logs/20261013-235129): one prompt that waits, and 3, 56 and 81.
Acceptance of the production build, one QEMU at a time: amd64
(-235255), aarch64 (-235411), riscv64 (-235620) to the zuse prompt, no
unknown word, hash 0x08873e0f44b7cb2a on all three.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 23:57:29 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 c95191736e fix(console): the serial line is found, not assumed -- from the devicetree on a board, COM1 by probe on a PC
Each board has one serial line that is its console, the lowest common
denominator beside the screen and keyboard.  Its address was QEMU's,
fixed: on a Raspberry Pi 5 the aarch64 one is ordinary RAM, written to
with every character printed; on a Milk-V Mars the riscv64 one is the
board's UART with registers four bytes apart, and the UEFI loader would
have waited for ever on its first character; on a PC with no COM1 the
prompt read 0xFF for ever.

console_attach_serial(), called before anything prints: COM1 if a UART
answers there; elsewhere the UART that /chosen/stdout-path names
(fdt_uart.c: alias, path, the address carried up through each bus's
ranges, reg-shift and reg-io-width); with no devicetree, QEMU's.  A
devicetree that names no usable console gives no line, not a guess.  A
line that does not come ready is given up, not waited on.  The riscv64
loader's early serial does the same.

tools/fdt_uart_test.c, run by hand, 19 checks plain and under the
sanitizers: devicetrees shaped like the Mars's, the Pi 5's and QEMU's,
what must find nothing, and a block cut short at every length; and the
Pi 5's real devicetree gives a PL011 at 0x107d001000.

Acceptance, one QEMU at a time: v3 on amd64 (logs/20261013-204436),
aarch64 (-204803) and riscv64 (-205001) to the zuse prompt, no unknown
word, hash 0x08873e0f44b7cb2a on all three as before.  -204600 is an
aarch64 run during which the disk images were restored under it by a
script that had been refused a second QEMU; it passed and is kept, and
was run again.  v4 on the three ISAs (-211149, -211444, -211857): POST
538 of 538, dict_hash 0xe5a57f3eb72ff94a, the typed session unchanged.
The Mars image through OpenSBI and U-Boot in QEMU took its line and its
interrupt controller from the devicetree and passed POST.

Found on the way and not mended (boards/BRINGUP.md 1.6): built with
EMERGENCY_CONSOLE_ENABLED=1 the prompt floods with empty lines.  -210442
shows it; the commit before this does the same.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 21:21:32 -04:00
rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5 f4e359859a docs(boards): bring-up checklist for the four boards, and what stands between today and a first boot
What to do on the day a board is on the bench: media, cabling, what to
watch for, what counts as a pass, what to keep.  Written before any board
has been booted.

Section 1 lists what was found in the code while writing it, none of it
fixed: the USB controller driver matches QEMU's controller only; the
production build shows no prompt without a thumbdrive login; there is no
USB keyboard driver and no disk driver but virtio; on the Pi 5 the console
writes every character to QEMU's UART address, which is RAM there; on the
Mars the console's UART register layout is probably not the board's; the
board images cannot build the v4 node.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 20:22:30 -04:00